This is a marketing review for orthopedic administrators and marketing leads. It says nothing about clinical quality, and no practice is named.
Considering ongoing marketing support? I run orthopedic marketing agency services for practices like yours. I can discuss your priorities and possible scope. Fees, responsibilities, account access and handover terms are defined in a written proposal. Request a marketing review
In my study of 21 orthopedic homepages, 14 never mentioned patient reviews or testimonials. That is the biggest gap, but it is not the only one. At the end of October 2026 I reviewed the public pages of 23 practice sites. Some of the practices that did show reviews were still wasting them, through duplicated quotes, broken widgets, reviews placed on pages nobody visits, and coverage that skipped some of the surgeons.
These are the seven patterns, each from a real site.
1. The same quote twice
One homepage slider repeated a single quote twice, labelled once as a hip replacement and once as a knee replacement. A reader who notices it trusts the whole slider less. Use each quote once, and label it with the procedure it is about.
2. A quote from someone who is not a patient
One practice’s testimonial widget held a wellness quote from a person who was not a patient. A visitor expecting patient experiences gets an endorsement from an outsider. Keep the widget to patients, with their permission.
3. A review counter that says zero
One homepage showed a counter reading “0+ 5 Star Reviews”, and one reviewer’s name displayed as garbled characters. A broken widget is worse than none. If a feed fails, hide it until it works, and check it on a phone each month.
4. A reviews page that is only a form
One practice’s patient experience page was only a form to submit a review, with no reviews on it. It asks for reviews, but gives nobody a reason to leave one. Show a few recent reviews above the form.
5. Reviews behind a separate link
Three practices kept patient stories on a different page: one behind a “Review Us” link, one on a page of its own and one on a separate testimonials page. Visitors rarely click through. Put reviews on the pages that carry the decision, such as the procedure and booking pages.
6. Testimonials for only some surgeons
One homepage carried testimonials for three of its five surgeons and none for the other two. A patient who is drawn to one of those two sees no support for the choice. Collect reviews by surgeon and show them on each bio.
7. Reviews on the About page only
At one practice the reviews widget appeared on the About page but not on the joint replacement page. At another, eight knee physicians were listed by name with no review on the page. Reviews belong where patients choose a surgeon or a procedure.
A quick fix list
- Show your star rating and review count in the header area of the homepage.
- Put two or three recent reviews on each main procedure page.
- Show reviews by surgeon on each bio page, with permission.
- Use each quote once, and label it with what it is about.
- Check any review widget on a phone, and hide it if it breaks.
- Follow the platform’s rules on how reviews may be displayed.
My patient reviews guide covers how to collect them, and the Google Business Profile guide covers the listing side.
How I did this, and its limits
- Sample: 23 practices found through public web research, and a separate automated check of 21 homepages. Hand-picked samples, not random or national ones.
- Method: I read each practice’s public pages and recorded specific, verifiable findings. The 14 of 21 figure comes from the homepage study linked above.
- What I did not measure: how reviews affect bookings. A practice may also have changed a page since I looked.
Want your reviews checked?
I will record a short free walkthrough of where your reviews appear on your site and your Google listing, with the fixes I would make first. You do not need a call to get it, and the fixes are yours to keep. Request a free audit.
